Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 02 Jul 2024, 11:32

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 02:56 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
Sure at 40 vs 80 FPS it may not matter much in single player, but once you drop to like 10 FPS then it's completely unplayable. So you really do need some consistent FPS that doesn't dip.


What games are you suggesting would drop to 10 fps in a surround screen game? Nothing I currently play with my GTX260+TH2G setup get that crappy of a fps, so why would a better card do worse? I don't buy your hypothetical reasoning there. :wink:

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
 


 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 03:03 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2007, 19:00
Posts: 647
[quote]Sure at 40 vs 80 FPS it may not matter much in single player, but once you drop to like 10 FPS then it's completely unplayable. So you really do need some consistent FPS that doesn't dip.


What games are you suggesting would drop to 10 fps in a surround screen game? Nothing I currently play with my GTX260+TH2G setup get that crappy of a fps, so why would a better card do worse? I don't buy your hypothetical reasoning there. :wink:

Well I saw GTA4 benchmarks of 3x2560x1600 as "average" 27FPS on Tom's Hardware, which means it probably drops to 10 pretty often during huge gunfights.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 03:06 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
[quote][quote]Sure at 40 vs 80 FPS it may not matter much in single player, but once you drop to like 10 FPS then it's completely unplayable. So you really do need some consistent FPS that doesn't dip.


What games are you suggesting would drop to 10 fps in a surround screen game? Nothing I currently play with my GTX260+TH2G setup get that crappy of a fps, so why would a better card do worse? I don't buy your hypothetical reasoning there. :wink:

Well I saw GTA4 benchmarks of 3x2560x1600 as "average" 27FPS on Tom's Hardware, which means it probably drops to 10 pretty often during huge gunfights.

3x2560x1600 is largely irrelevant to me and I would think most surround screen budgets. :wink:

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 03:10 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 01:08
Posts: 1898
I'd love to play GTA 4 at 5040x1050 with all the options on, or maybe just like medium settings. But that might still be unrealistic expectation.


Why ? I play it all maxed at 5040x1050, including visible distance at 100, you dont need a "next gen" GPU for this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 03:42 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 29 May 2006, 02:23
Posts: 873
[quote]I'd love to play GTA 4 at 5040x1050 with all the options on, or maybe just like medium settings. But that might still be unrealistic expectation.


Why ? I play it all maxed at 5040x1050, including visible distance at 100, you dont need a "next gen" GPU for this.Any console port you really don't. The 8570 is probably 10x more gpu than the xbox.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 03:49 
Offline

Joined: 26 Aug 2009, 21:49
Posts: 46
[quote]I'd love to play GTA 4 at 5040x1050 with all the options on, or maybe just like medium settings. But that might still be unrealistic expectation.


Why ? I play it all maxed at 5040x1050, including visible distance at 100, you dont need a "next gen" GPU for this.
What video card do you have? Also, keep in mind that this game is CPU limited, looks like you have a better CPU than me. And the game runs considerably better on nVIDIA (unfortunately for me) than on ATI. :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 06:44 
Offline
I Donated
I Donated
User avatar

Joined: 08 Sep 2009, 04:05
Posts: 68
The 8570 is probably 10x more gpu than the xbox.

Well for a video card from 3 years in the future I should hope so.

_________________
check my blog: cybereality.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2009, 11:58 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 06 Nov 2008, 01:08
Posts: 1898
What video card do you have? Also, keep in mind that this game is CPU limited, looks like you have a better CPU than me. And the game runs considerably better on nVIDIA (unfortunately for me) than on ATI. :(


A pair of GTX 280, a quad at 4 Ghz makes 1 Gb VRAM to be the limit in fact, but its very playable all maxed, including clip capture on. :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 30 Sep 2009, 16:13 
Offline

Joined: 05 Oct 2008, 05:49
Posts: 373
If you guys don't care about FPS or playing games and just want the ability to run MANY MONITORS AT ONCE

You can get the ATI FireMV/FirePro 2400, they have PCI (I don't recommend this connection though) , PCIe x1, PCIe x16 flavors.

Each can run up to 4 monitors via dvi (or VGA with adapter). and NONE of that active adapter bs to deal with.

I have the PCIe x1 version and it runs perfectly. just not a gaming card. they go for around $100-$200 per one on ebay.

You can get two of the 2400 fire cards and easily run up to 8 monitors in one machine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: HD 5870 1GB vs 2GB
PostPosted: 30 Sep 2009, 17:50 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 06 May 2006, 12:46
Posts: 1640
If you guys don't care about FPS or playing games and just want the ability to run MANY MONITORS AT ONCE

You can get the ATI FireMV/FirePro 2400, they have PCI (I don't recommend this connection though) , PCIe x1, PCIe x16 flavors.

Each can run up to 4 monitors via dvi (or VGA with adapter). and NONE of that active adapter bs to deal with.

I have the PCIe x1 version and it runs perfectly. just not a gaming card. they go for around $100-$200 per one on ebay.

You can get two of the 2400 fire cards and easily run up to 8 monitors in one machine.


The key question is are they EyeFinity compatible? If I just wanted more 2D desktop display any old graphics card can do that.

_________________
Brad Hawthorne
Product Manager
Nthusim Pty. Ltd. | www.nthusim.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group