Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 19 Nov 2024, 11:46

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 13 Dec 2009, 04:09 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00
Posts: 7358
Just tried this in Vista, and no joy. I read the EDID info, which didn't have any details on 5040x1050. Went ahead and put all the other info in, and was going to see if Matrox had the timing details. When I tried to enter 5040 in the "H Active Pixel" box, I get this error: "Horizontal Active Pixels must be between 0 and 4095. Wonder if Win7 has the same limitation.

Is there any forum where we can inquire and see why that limit is?

Edit: Tried in Win7 as well. No joy there. May try to see if I can get 5040x1050 out of my EyeFinity, but it looks like no go on the TH2Go.


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 13 Dec 2009, 05:44 
Offline

Joined: 02 Dec 2008, 11:55
Posts: 75
Ibrin, I got the same error when trying to get my 5970 working with my th2go so I gave up.

I did then try using it again to get that resolution in eyefinity, i.e. 1680x1050 on my native 1920x1200 monitors, just for increased framerates.

That didnt seem to work either as I created an override inf file that had 1680 ad the highest resolution but it still kept going to 1920..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Dec 2009, 05:54 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00
Posts: 7358
Did you delete all other res options in the inf file?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Dec 2009, 06:28 
Offline

Joined: 02 Dec 2008, 11:55
Posts: 75
I admit I didn't , I just got rid of the 'native' 1920x1200 and told it the panels native res was 1680x1050.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Dec 2009, 15:42 
Offline

Joined: 30 Oct 2009, 19:20
Posts: 177
You need to remove all other options or it won't work. Don't edit an existing EDID make a new one that is empty.

The Eyefinity/TH2go isn't controlled by the EDID you don't set 5040 x 1050 in the EDID you set the monitor limits so if you require 5040 x 1050 Eyefinity you set 1680 x 1050 in the monitor EDID. For 5760 x 1200 you set 1920 x 1200 etc.

Try these timings for 1680 x 1050 @ 60Hz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 13 Dec 2009, 16:58 
Offline
Founder
Founder
User avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2003, 05:00
Posts: 7358
The TH2Go is seen as a monitor and it has its own EDID. You would need to set it for 5040x1050 to get Windows to see it. The whole point is that the box fools Windows into seeing one super-wide monitor

Aren't EDID timing unique to a monitor?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 14 Dec 2009, 00:35 
Offline

Joined: 30 Oct 2009, 19:20
Posts: 177
The TH2Go is seen as a monitor and it has its own EDID. You would need to set it for 5040x1050 to get Windows to see it. The whole point is that the box fools Windows into seeing one super-wide monitor

Aren't EDID timing unique to a monitor?


Ah ok.

The timings add up to 60Hz so should be safe. I didn't have a problem using them on my 24" 1920 x 1200. Ideally you should use timings for your panel type but if you can't find any then thats not a bad place to start.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2009, 02:51 
Offline

Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 05:42
Posts: 140
isn't it kinda lame that eyefinity/ati doesn't just let you set it from it's control panel? seems like we have to jump through hoops

Totally lame. Bordering on lazy. They appear to have assumed that we would all be happy to simply run our panels at max (native) res, along with a couple other generics (that don't even have the correct aspect ratio) and left it at that.

Oh yeah - editing EDID's: this is really gonna catch on with the mainstream. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2009, 04:48 
Offline

Joined: 13 Sep 2009, 15:53
Posts: 245
No, this is not "laziness" but issues with the way Windows does stuff. As mentioned in the other thread.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Dec 2009, 06:01 
Offline

Joined: 05 Jun 2008, 05:42
Posts: 140
No, this is not "laziness" but issues with the way Windows does stuff. As mentioned in the other thread.

Will this ever be solved? I'm referring to the inability to select lower triplehead resolutions (and I don't count the useless 3840x1024 and 2400x600).

If not, I need to return these 24" monitors I just purchased. Just need a straight answer - no hard feelings.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group