Let me just say that I hate it when other sites break NDA, or get news leaked from someone who broke NDA. Makes it look like the WSGF isn't getting the information that is out there, when in reality we are honoring the NDA and relationship with ATI...
A private secrecy contract is not a resilient security situation (hence the leaks), but it isn't without checks & balances. Those other sites that actually leaked are either getting shut out of preview knowledge next time, or they are not going to be identified - and thus, they get no credit for having the info.
You can either be a review site that gets actual review copies and does hands-on journalism while also transcribing press releases, or a rumor site that aggregates various cloak-and-dagger sources to build a picture of the future for the reader, but is mostly reliant on other people's research if they have a question and may be easily manipulated. Both are useful.
As long as you don't exercise editorial control to try and hush up the rest of us talking about rumors, we understand your inability to talk about them yourself.