Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 15 Dec 2024, 14:44

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: 15 Jan 2009, 07:22 
Offline

Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 23:48
Posts: 28
You should integrate the computer into your home audio system, get more return on your investment.

I do like a lot of boom in my games and stuff, as it adds to the realism when a grenade goes off if your room shakes. Also once in a while the mood strikes me turn my hose into a dance hall. Bass is addicting to me so a sub is an important part of my setup even for music.

Subs with thick rubber? Not sure the one your talking about but I have seen Audiobahns like that, but they are pure SPL not SQL.

I buy on a budget, I get something thats along the best quality for the price. Once you go past that mark the price starts to go up rather sharply for the limited return on quality. I remember the days I would eye down B&W speakers thinking I would have a set in my living area. But I wont for the simple fact I have so many other things to invest in that would mean more to me.

The cheapest method to get really high quality sound is of course a good pair of headphones. Still even here people spend thousands though. Id be quite happy with a pair of AD700's.

Dammit, I cannot find that sub for the life of me. This subwoofer produces quality response but I can't remember who makes it. It's a more esoteric brand, it's just a small 8" driver with very thick rubber and a great crossover. I'm wanting to say MSRP is somewhere north of $1000 but I'm not sure (This is going to bother me until I find out).

You don't realize though, my desk doesn't allow for full tower speakers to be used and while I don't oppose bookshelf speakers I'm not selling my towers to go to bookshelfs. I bought the Z-5500s before I was a full blown audiophile, all the components were bought after the fact. Had I still had cheapo speakers back then I probably would've done something more like that, but given these are DTS capable and THX certified and sound great I don't see much good cause to spend all that money on them at this point. I would want 5.1 so I'd need a center, four bookshelfs, and a subwoofer - in all it would cost me probably $800+ to get a setup I would be satisfied with. Given this setup works great and is paid for, I'm not going to throw it out just for that idea!


Top
 Profile  
 


PostPosted: 15 Jan 2009, 08:57 
Offline

Joined: 02 Jan 2006, 18:49
Posts: 913
@ Frag, I have never cared for Creative's speakers either. They're not as atrocious as their sound cards but they still leave a lot to be desired to me. Trust me, I've done a blind comparison with an audiophile friend of mine and he thinks the Z-5500s sound great.
I'm with you on anything they make other than the original (S700/S750)) Gigaworks or Gigaworks 2.0 T series, which some here have and swear by, but the S7## I did compare in the same store alongside the Z5500s and the S7## is not only better sounding to me, but has more appropriate wattage and longer lasting controls.

To a large degree speakers are personal preference of course, those not liking Ti tweets are probably not going to like them. They don't have an overly bright sound though because the domes are surrounded well with damping material. The main thing that sold me though was the noticeably tighter and more accurate bass.

I've also noticed the Z5500s have a bit of hiss in the center channel. Another thing some don't realize about the Creative Gigaworks, esp the S7## series, is they get better with age. There is a bit of a break in period where they become a bit more natural sounding. When it comes right down to it, you can't build a speaker set at lower price point with more features (hardware decoding) and have it be as good in sound quality. There's going to be some shortcuts somewhere, namely lack of tweeters and skimping on sub wattage, which can make them boomy and short in lifespan.

I don't think you've done much comparing concerning the Z5500 and S7## Gigaworks if you think they don't have that much wattage to the 8" sub. Anyone that knows quality subs knows you're far more likely to hurt them with a lack of proper wattage than too much. The Z5500's 188 watts to their 10" sub is part of the reason I'm sure that they aren't as tight sounding, though I doubt the speaker magnet, voice coil, or cabinet is as robust either considering what they charge for the features they include.

I have my PC in my living room, which is connected via an open wall to my kitchen and entry way of my apartment. There's no way I'm going to use a sub that isn't the tightest I can find in my price range with that much space for the bass frequencies to fill. That would be asking for premature failure.

Here's where you really get off track though. Just because you picked out an Energy sub doesn't mean it's going to be built with as much wattage nor does wattage itself tell the whole story of a sub. Energy is also not as audiophile a brand as you make it out to be. They were common in Good Guys stores, a chain that had abysmal sales staff that liked to exaggerate heavily to make a sale. Many of their stores have gone out of business. In fact I'm not sure they're even around at all anymore.

I understand that some are going to have their preferences, but for you to mock the facts I've given about the Gigaworks as if fallacy clearly indicates you are labeling everything Creative makes as bad merely for their sound card reputation and that you haven't in fact done much research on the speakers I'm referring to. In fact they aren't even made by Creative, they're made for them by Cambridge SoundWorks, and that's where the specs come from.

If you're good with yours fine, but I think you need to do more digging before you assume the S700s are advertised fraudulently. Besides that, there's a lot more to a sub's low frequency output than merely it's cone size as well. Much of the low frequency a sub puts out is via a well made tuned port if they're engineered efficiently as most PC speaker sets at a price point need to be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Jan 2009, 11:53 
Offline

Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 12:46
Posts: 26
Does any of you guys have some experience with this one:

GigaWorks ProGamer G550W


http://us.creative.com/products/product.asp?category=4&subcategory=789&product=14661


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Jan 2009, 13:22 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
When you used the 4870X2 as an example of cpu limits. What do you mean exactly?

Pretty much what you said in the rest below this... With a 4870X2, even a fairly GPU limited game like Crysis gets a FPS boost as the CPU speed increases. :) It seems like CPU bottlenecking, but coming from a slightly different angle.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 15 Jan 2009, 23:39 
Offline

Joined: 02 Jan 2006, 18:49
Posts: 913
Does any of you guys have some experience with this one:
Sadly that is what they replaced the original S700 set I have with, and it's much less capable with only 316 watts total power. They also have full range vs two way satellites. Plus they added features you don't need like wireless rear speakers, which can be more of a minus than plus. As a result, it's priced too high for what you get in sound quality.

IMO, if you can't afford the Gigaworks S750s, the Logitech Z5500s would probably be better than those, and you'd have hardware decoding too. Best to take a listen first if you can and be aware that the larger the room size you play them in and the louder the volume, the tighter you'll want the bass to be to avoid problems, esp if you watch movies with them.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2009, 00:46 
Offline

Joined: 14 Jan 2009, 12:46
Posts: 26
[quote]Does any of you guys have some experience with this one:
Sadly that is what they replaced the original S700 set I have with, and it's much less capable with only 316 watts total power. They also have full range vs two way satellites. Plus they added features you don't need like wireless rear speakers, which can be more of a minus than plus. As a result, it's priced too high for what you get in sound quality.


Thanks on that one!


IMO, if you can't afford the Gigaworks S750s, the Logitech Z5500s would probably be better than those, and you'd have hardware decoding too. Best to take a listen first if you can and be aware that the larger the room size you play them in and the louder the volume, the tighter you'll want the bass to be to avoid problems, esp if you watch movies with them.


I haven´t decided were I am going to put my new system

Depending on the room it will be a 5.1 or 7.1

In other words:

5.1: Logitech Speakerset Z-5500

7.1: Creative Speakerset Gigaworks S750


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2009, 01:08 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 21 Mar 2006, 05:01
Posts: 1993
If you can afford the rest of that setup, I'd suggest an actual home-theatre setup, with proper receiver full-range speakers. Finding a good amp is the hard part, speakers can be pieced together pretty easily.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2009, 05:01 
Offline

Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 23:48
Posts: 28
[quote]@ Frag, I have never cared for Creative's speakers either. They're not as atrocious as their sound cards but they still leave a lot to be desired to me. Trust me, I've done a blind comparison with an audiophile friend of mine and he thinks the Z-5500s sound great.
I'm with you on anything they make other than the original (S700/S750)) Gigaworks or Gigaworks 2.0 T series, which some here have and swear by, but the S7## I did compare in the same store alongside the Z5500s and the S7## is not only better sounding to me, but has more appropriate wattage and longer lasting controls.

To a large degree speakers are personal preference of course, those not liking Ti tweets are probably not going to like them. They don't have an overly bright sound though because the domes are surrounded well with damping material. The main thing that sold me though was the noticeably tighter and more accurate bass.

I've also noticed the Z5500s have a bit of hiss in the center channel. Another thing some don't realize about the Creative Gigaworks, esp the S7## series, is they get better with age. There is a bit of a break in period where they become a bit more natural sounding. When it comes right down to it, you can't build a speaker set at lower price point with more features (hardware decoding) and have it be as good in sound quality. There's going to be some shortcuts somewhere, namely lack of tweeters and skimping on sub wattage, which can make them boomy and short in lifespan.

I don't think you've done much comparing concerning the Z5500 and S7## Gigaworks if you think they don't have that much wattage to the 8" sub. Anyone that knows quality subs knows you're far more likely to hurt them with a lack of proper wattage than too much. The Z5500's 188 watts to their 10" sub is part of the reason I'm sure that they aren't as tight sounding, though I doubt the speaker magnet, voice coil, or cabinet is as robust either considering what they charge for the features they include.

I have my PC in my living room, which is connected via an open wall to my kitchen and entry way of my apartment. There's no way I'm going to use a sub that isn't the tightest I can find in my price range with that much space for the bass frequencies to fill. That would be asking for premature failure.

Here's where you really get off track though. Just because you picked out an Energy sub doesn't mean it's going to be built with as much wattage nor does wattage itself tell the whole story of a sub. Energy is also not as audiophile a brand as you make it out to be. They were common in Good Guys stores, a chain that had abysmal sales staff that liked to exaggerate heavily to make a sale. Many of their stores have gone out of business. In fact I'm not sure they're even around at all anymore.

I understand that some are going to have their preferences, but for you to mock the facts I've given about the Gigaworks as if fallacy clearly indicates you are labeling everything Creative makes as bad merely for their sound card reputation and that you haven't in fact done much research on the speakers I'm referring to. In fact they aren't even made by Creative, they're made for them by Cambridge SoundWorks, and that's where the specs come from.

If you're good with yours fine, but I think you need to do more digging before you assume the S700s are advertised fraudulently. Besides that, there's a lot more to a sub's low frequency output than merely it's cone size as well. Much of the low frequency a sub puts out is via a well made tuned port if they're engineered efficiently as most PC speaker sets at a price point need to be.
Okay, you're making up shit about my speakers. Tell me how I'm supposed to not take offense to that. It's like someone who's never seen my car or anything is saying "Hey, your car runs like shit and it's no good and my car is much better" all based on some poor misinformed bullshit you found on some forum or made up. That's all it is, complete 100% bullshit. My analog knob works fine, my speakers have no hiss, there is no hum, they are not flawed, there is NOTHING wrong with them. Stop making up this crock of shit that you seem to be finding all this stuff from - Logitech made better speakers than Creative. Maybe you don't want to believe it but don't make up shit about the thing you don't like because you don't like it.

I dislike Bose due to their characteristic sounds, but I'm not going to say stuff like "Bose speakers hum when you aren't playing sounds because they use low quality components that allow AC hum to get in and that makes them bad". I just made that up, but you get my point. This is what you're doing, or what the people you heard it from are doing. The same way people who love the 360/PS3 will make up shit about the other because they like what they have better. I don't like the sound produced by Bose speakers but one flaw I will say is factual in base is the fact their DVD Lifestyle systems regularly have problems with the DVD drive on them not working. That's it though, nothing else other than lower quality sound I don't like. You're not just saying my speakers sound lower quality, you're saying they're built like shit and use cheap components and are worthless (Whether you intend to or not, that's how I'm perceiving it).

You're sure the subwoofer isn't as tight sounding even though you haven't personally heard it? Okay, in the audio world you can't say SHIT about ANYTHING you haven't heard in person. Credibility thrown out the window with that statement. Obviously you don't have high demand for quality bass if an 8" sub satisfies you in a larger room. Unless you're using that sub I can't remember the name of, it's not gonna happen.

And Energy isn't a "good enough" brand for you? Come on, you telling me Energy isn't so great is like someone with a Toyota telling the guy with his BMW his car isn't as good as his Toyota. Energy is an audiophile brand. If I come up to random strangers and say "Hey, have you heard of Energy?" most aren't going to know what it is. Generally audiophile equipment is less well known unless it's something like Denon, H/K, etc. with mass market.

You have the biggest error in perception of how I judge those speakers. I have heard Creative speakers. No, not those and I'm not judging the quality of their sound - that I don't know of. It might be fine. All I know is all the Creative products I HAVE heard have sounded pretty cheap and low quality (even the more expensive stuff). I make a generalized assumption based on this. I suppose Creative could make a freak good set of speakers but they haven't done it in multiple tries previously which leads me to doubt their ability to do it at all. My father has a set of Cambridge Soundworks on his computer and while acceptable for average listening, they are not the highest quality speakers and certainly not comparable to the Z-5500s.

I'm telling you, any company that claims so much power out of something SO tiny makes me VERY suspicious. You're going to tell me your all-in-one Creative system which includes speakers and a sub (invariably similar to a Home theater in a box), which cost something like $400-500 new from what I recollect is better than a DCM TB-1212 subwoofer? The DCM TB-1212 is a 12" subwoofer and it is 150 watts. It goes for $500. You're telling me you think your subwoofer is comparable to something like an SVS PB10-NSD subwoofer - a 10" driver subwoofer with 300 watts for $429? Uh uh. I don't think so. Creative is lying and you're eating it up. No way that chincey little bitty sub made by a comparably no name brand (put next to DCM and SVS) is going to be better or even close. It's a nice idea, but you listen in person to either subwoofer and you'll notice the quality difference.

The crossover in that Creative can't be anything at all. How much does it weigh? Subwoofer alone, let me know what it weighs? Additionally, I'm curious to hear your opinon on 5.1 vs 7.1. This will tell me more than you can imagine, so please do let me know what you think.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2009, 07:17 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2006, 14:58
Posts: 1497
Everybody is entitled to an opinion, please keep it civil...

_________________
ViciousXUSMC on the Web - YouTube :: FaceBook :: Website


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: 16 Jan 2009, 07:45 
Offline

Joined: 22 Dec 2008, 23:48
Posts: 28
Everybody is entitled to an opinion, please keep it civil...

I respect that, but there's a difference between expressing an opinion and then simply bad mouthing something else because you don't like it. I don't like AMD or ATI quite a lot but I don't make up bad things about them, the only bad things I mention about them are proven flaws such as the original Phenom's glitch that ate away at performance. I may jest about them being cheap for a reason but never in a serious suggestion, and as best I can tell this is a serious discussion. It's one thing to say something like "360s are unreliable, they all get the RRoD" which could be offensive if it weren't true but I love the 360 and I concede this point - they are damn unreliable and I've had three of them give me the RRoD. But to say something is unreliable so vehemently when it has no factual basing is just insulting and rude.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group