Widescreen Gaming Forum

[-noun] Web community dedicated to ensuring PC games run properly on your tablet, netbook, personal computer, HDTV and multi-monitor gaming rig.
It is currently 14 Dec 2024, 23:55

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: no good
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2010, 08:08 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 23:27
Posts: 1172
oops i thought i hit reply to the 260.52 nvidia driver post. thats what i was referring to. would make more sense if it was in that thread.


sorry for the arsey reply then!

Did your config work fine before the 260.52?

_________________
P8Z68-V Pro | 2600K | HR02 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 128GB M4 + 6TB | X-Fi > HD595 | AX850 | Tai Chi | PB278Q | G110 + Deathadder 2013
P8Z77-V | 3570K | Mugen 2 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 500GB | X-750 | Fractal R3 | U2212HM | G110 + G400
P8H77-I | G860 | 4650 | 2x2GB XMS | 320GB | CX500 | Prodigy | T22B350EW | MX518
DC3217IYE | 1x4GB Vengeance | 64GB M4 | TX-42VT20E


Top
 Profile  
 


 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2010, 08:09 
Offline
Insiders
Insiders
User avatar

Joined: 15 Apr 2005, 23:27
Posts: 1172
HardOCP have compared this driver (with GTX 460 1GB SLI) to the 10.8 cats with the application profile (with HD 5850 crossfire)

http://www.hardocp.com/article/2010/09/13/nv_gtx_460_1gb_sli_vs_ati_hd_5850_cfx_redux

Seems the 5850 has great improvements.

_________________
P8Z68-V Pro | 2600K | HR02 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 128GB M4 + 6TB | X-Fi > HD595 | AX850 | Tai Chi | PB278Q | G110 + Deathadder 2013
P8Z77-V | 3570K | Mugen 2 | HD5850 | 2x4GB Vengeance LP | 500GB | X-750 | Fractal R3 | U2212HM | G110 + G400
P8H77-I | G860 | 4650 | 2x2GB XMS | 320GB | CX500 | Prodigy | T22B350EW | MX518
DC3217IYE | 1x4GB Vengeance | 64GB M4 | TX-42VT20E


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 14 Sep 2010, 09:52 
Offline

Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 08:34
Posts: 50
official beta is out. 260.63

_________________
Current Config:

GTX 680 4GB in SLI
Intel 980 x @ 4Ghz


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 24 Sep 2010, 23:11 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2010, 00:50
Posts: 90
[quote]Merged in. :)

I've not tried this. I've decided that my Surround setup is working fine, I don't intend to fiddle until something comes along that has issues with the 258.96 driver, or I move to watercooling on the GPUs and reinstall on an SSD at the same time.


I am in agreement...I have played surround mode Borderlands + Zombie DLC + Knoxx DLC start to finish with not one crash...it ain't broke so I ain't fixin' it...(addictive game!)


yep... my system has been so stable until a driver comes along that has confirmed significant performance gains in surround mode or adds new useful features I am sticking with 258.96.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 25 Sep 2010, 04:48 
Offline

Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 17:19
Posts: 23
Using MSI and in game gameplay, these are my performance gains. For me it was a huge difference. Lcd readout TEMP--GPU USAGE--FAN SPEED.

2- 480's in sli, no overclocking, on 258.96, in BC2.








Exact same setup, same in game settings, on 260.62.




Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 26 Sep 2010, 06:49 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2010, 00:50
Posts: 90
your first two images don't show FPS.. did you mean you were at 63 FPS and jumped up over 10 FPS more with the new drivers? Do you see improvements like this in all games?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 26 Sep 2010, 07:16 
Offline

Joined: 11 Jun 2010, 17:19
Posts: 23
Naw, actually I didn't know what my fps was before the update. I didn't scroll all the way down in the MSI settings, noticing that I could also monitor my fps, until just about a week ago.

The middle number is what I'm referring to, my gpu usage. The 258 drivers were really taxing my cards and 260 just about cut it in half.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 26 Sep 2010, 16:58 
Offline
Editors
Editors
User avatar

Joined: 14 Oct 2003, 13:52
Posts: 5706
Naw, actually I didn't know what my fps was before the update. I didn't scroll all the way down in the MSI settings, noticing that I could also monitor my fps, until just about a week ago.

The middle number is what I'm referring to, my gpu usage. The 258 drivers were really taxing my cards and 260 just about cut it in half.

Whether that is a good thing or not depends on whether it's had an effect on framerate. ;)

If the 260 drivers can cut GPU utilisation (and therefore heat) on my GTX460s, I'll be happy... but not at the expense of framerate - I'm dancing on a thin line for playability in some games at 6064x1200 already... ;)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 09 Oct 2010, 22:04 
Offline

Joined: 30 May 2009, 00:19
Posts: 71
So is updating to the 260 driver a good thing or not yet ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 260.52 posted
PostPosted: 10 Oct 2010, 09:22 
Offline

Joined: 27 Aug 2010, 08:34
Posts: 50
for me it was. smoothed out alot of games and the new nvcpl loads way faster

_________________
Current Config:

GTX 680 4GB in SLI
Intel 980 x @ 4Ghz


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  




Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group